Prometheanism 2.0 @ Dutch Art Institute (1 May, 2016)

Read the invitation in Dutch 

You are warmly invited to Roaming Assembly#5 a symposium curated by Bassam El Baroni 

PROMETHEANISM 2.0

With the participation of: Jan Adriaans, Katia Barrett, Ben Burtenshaw, Patricia Reed, Inigo Wilkins, Peter Wolfendale and Yuk Hui. Moderation: Mohammad Salemy

Please scroll for introduction & program

ROAMING ASSEMBLY: a recurring public symposium scheduled to take place once a month (always on a Sunday afternoon, always convivial), functioning as it were as the DAI-week’s ‘centerfold’.

Although closely interlinked with the DAI’s academic activities, the editions of this state-of-the-art speculative and hybrid program are not conceived as plain extensions of the regular DAI-seminars, but rather envisioned as sovereign happenings, aiming to mobilize our bodies, our intelligences.

Free admission, no reservation needed for the symposium

Sunday May 1, 2016 from 13:00 till 18:30

Location: Showroom Arnhem, Kleine Oord 177 in Arnhem (at one minute walking distance from the DAI’s premises).

After the event, around 19:00, a dinner (prepared by our amazing vegan chef Mari Pitkänen and her team) will be served at the DAI. Costs for visitors: € 10 for food & wine. If you wish to join us for the dinner you are most welcome to make a reservation at dutchartinstitute@artez.nl (please note that seating is limited ~closing date April 22, 2016).

Program

13:00 – 13:20

Welcome by Gabriëlle Schleijpen, DAI director

followed by a short

Introduction

by Bassam El Baroni, curator, writer and core theory-tutor, DAI

“Prometheanism is simply the claim that there is no reason to assume a predetermined limit to what we can achieve or to the ways in which we can transform ourselves and our world.” [1]

Concurrent to global post-financial crisis politics, a theory for a contemporary prometheanism has been carving itself out from different strands of philosophy and transdisciplinary research. As an event, Prometheanism 2.0 is a condensed and partial account of this strain of thought that cuts across rationalism, pragmatism, realism, materialism, science, technology, computation, economics, politics, and art to shape its foundations. It attempts to articulate the major positions, concerns, and questions for a contemporary prometheanism through both theoretical talks and artistic representations. In which sense can art practice be promethean? Where does the urge come from? Why and how should art take on this challenge? This event hopes to bring to the table discussions and questions regarding a contemporary promethean position and its embrace in art practice, contributing to further sharpening, clarifying, and formulating a prometheanism 2.0 that, to an extent, still remains germinal. READ MORE

13:20 – 13:35

Beyond Cyborgs

by Benjamin Burtenshaw (DAI, 2015), artist

Beyond Cyborgs is an artwork that takes the form of a 10 minute introduction followed by an audio performance comprised of four short audio extracts played at stated intervals throughout the day. READ MORE

13:35 – 14:20

Prometheanism and Rationalism

by Peter Wolfendale, independent philosopher

The aim of this talk is to articulate and defend the connection between contemporary forms of prometheanism and rationalism. It will begin by defining prometheanism through its opposition to political liberalism and normative naturalism, as developed by the projects of left-accelerationism and xenofeminism.READ MORE

Beyond Cyborgs

(Second Audio Extract)

14:25 – 15:10

Nontrivial Art: Transformative Instrumentalism

by Patricia Reed, artist, writer and designer

Contemporary Art (CA), in its systemic condition, is buttressed by four core axioms that have been notably identified by Amanda Beech and Suhail Malik: art can be anything and anywhere; it is semantically precarious; it can only gain meaning through the correlation of interpretation; and, it is non-propositional. Guided by such conditions, CA can only adhere to models of negative freedom (functionally speaking) that are isomorphic with our neoliberal hegemony, even though the rhetoric and discursive sphere surrounding CA make political claims otherwise.READ MORE

15:10 – 15:40

Q & A

1st session’s open questions and follow up discussion, moderated by Mohammad Salemy, independent New York-based artist, critic, and curator. With the participation of the audience, Peter Wolfendale, and Patricia Reed.

15:40 

Tea & Coffee Break 

16:00 – 16:30

Prototype-Protagonists

by Katia Barrett (DAI,2016) & Jan Adriaans (DAI,2015), artists

A Film Screening followed by a short discussion with Bassam El Baroni,

Prototype-Protagonists is a new film, duration approx. 12 minutes. Shot in Cologne, Germany, this is its first public screening.

For salamanders, regeneration after injury, such as the loss of a limb, involves regrowth of structure and restoration of function with the constant possibility of twinning or other odd topographical productions at the site of the former injury. The regrown limb can be monstrous, duplicated, potent. We have all been injured, profoundly. We require regeneration, not rebirth. (Haraway,1991)” READ MORE

16:30 – 17:15

On the Becoming of Prometheus

by Yuk Hui, researcher and writer

Günther Anders, in the first volume of his The Obsolescence of Man(1956), described the emergence of a ‘promethean shame’ produced by the new industrial technologies, which he claimed replaced ‘heroic prometheanism’ and turned into a symptom of the times. After decades, an optimistic prometheanism is growing across the globe. READ MORE 

Beyond Cyborgs

(Third Audio Extract)

17:15 – 18:00

Upsetting Equilibria: Why Prometheans Don’t Play Dice

by Inigo Wilkins, researcher and co-director of Glass Bead

A common objection to Prometheanism is that the unforeseen contingencies of technological change may upset the ‘fragile equilibrium’ of nature. There are conservative religious claims that certain technologies amount to ‘playing God’ (e.g. pro-life), and vitalist anti-capitalist variants, which assert that nature is priceless and should not be risked (e.g. anti-GM). READ MORE

18:00 – 18:30

Q & A

2nd session open questions and follow up discussion, moderated by Mohammad Salemy, with the participation of the Audience, Yuk Hui, and Inigo Wilkins.

Beyond Cyborgs

(Fourth Audio Extract)

Drinks for all & THE END of Roaming Assembly#5

 

 

Latest from Blog

Chinese translation of ChatGPT, or the Eschatology of Machines (Voices of Photography, issue 35)

ChatGPT自2022年11月推出以來,便引發了狂熱與恐懼。它對不同語言的語義及語法的嫻熟掌握(但尚未精通內容),令只是期待普通聊天機器人的使用者感到驚訝。有些大學院校立即禁止學生使用ChatGPT來寫論文,因為它的表現優於多數人類學生。報紙上的專欄文章則宣布了教育的終結──不僅因為學生可以用它來做作業,還因為ChatGPT比很多老師能提供更多的資訊。人工智慧似乎已征服了另一個根據古典哲學來定義人性的領域:邏各斯(logos)。恐慌隨著存在領域(existential territory)1的進一步喪失而加劇。當氣候的崩壞和機器人的反叛召喚出了末世,人類歷史的世界末日想像變得更加強烈。 末日對於現代人來說從來都不陌生。事實上,哲學家卡爾.洛維特(Karl Löwith)在1949年出版的《歷史的意義》(Meaning in History)一書即指出,現代歷史哲學──從黑格爾(Hegel)到布克哈特(Burckhardt)──就是末世論的世俗化2。歷史的終極目標便是使超越的變成內在(makes the transcendent immanent),不論是耶穌基督的第二次降臨或只是成為神人(Homo deus)。更廣泛地說,這種對歷史時期的聖經式或亞伯拉罕式想像,為人類的存在提供了許多深刻反思,卻也阻礙了對於我們的未來之理解。 more