Attentional Economy and Multi-Screen Architecture – interview with Beatriz Colomina

[This interview was originally commissioned by  Theory, Culture and Society]

In November, 2010, Professor Beatriz Colomina gave a talk in Goldsmiths entitled ‘Multi-screen architecture’, where she suggested that ‘The state of distraction in the metropolis, described so eloquently by Walter Benjamin early in the twentieth century, seems to have been replaced by a new form of distraction, which is to say a new form of attention.’ (program abstract 2010) We recall Benjamin wrote in The Work of Art at the Age of Mechanical Reproduction, ‘Architecture has always represented the prototype of a work of art the reception of which is consummated by a collectivity in a state of distraction…. Architecture [is] appropriated in a twofold manner: by use and by perception, or rather, by touch and sight. Such appropriation cannot be understood in terms of the attentive concentration of a tourist before a famous building …[Buildings are appropriated] not so much by attention as by habit.’ How then is Benjamin’s conception of the ‘state of distraction’ is further transformed today in the multi-screen architecture? What is the nature of this new form of distraction, which is widely known as Attention Deficit Disorder? How can we make sense of it, not as a symptom?

Professor Colomina approached the multi-screen culture from a very different perspective compared with authors who wrote on technology and culture,
her investigation starts with the 1959 US-USSR joined Exhibition in Moscow titled “science, technology and culture.” In that exhibition, the designers Ray and Charles Eames were commissioned to produce a multi-screen installation titled ‘Glimpses of the USA’. This installation on the one hand embeds the cold-war ideology: an American style of life; on the other hand it also anticipated a new form of attention and creative process which was already theorized by the Eames. Yuk Hui interviewed Professor Colomina on mult-screen architecture tracing this historical trajectory and the questions concerning attention deficit disorder, cold-war ideology, architecture and subjectivity. The interview was conducted on 14th January 2011 during her trip to London (where she delivered a talk in Architecture Association)

[Image 1 and 2: they are captured from the video: The design genius of Charles + Ray Eames www.youtube.com/watch?v=b0vDWqp6J7Y]

[vsw id=”21508005″ source=”vimeo” width=”425″ height=”344″ autoplay=”no”]

[vsw id=”21508361″ source=”vimeo” width=”425″ height=”344″ autoplay=”no”]

[vsw id=”21508758″ source=”vimeo” width=”425″ height=”344″ autoplay=”no”]

Professor Beatriz Colomina is an architecture historian, she is also the Founding Director of the Program in Media and Modernity at Princeton University. She is author of Privacy and Publicity: Modern Architecture as Mass Media (Cambridge: The MIT Press, 1994), Sexuality and Space (New York: Princeton Architectural Press, 1992), Architectureproduction (New York: Princeton Architectural Press, 1988)

Latest from Blog

許煜在 ArtReview Power 100名單中排名第 40

許煜位列 ArtReview 每年評選的《Power 100》第 40 名—這份名單旨在評選藝術界最具影響力的人物,而他亦被稱為藝術與科技領域的關鍵思想家。」 https://artreview.co

《後歐洲》日文譯本出版

日本出版社岩波書店出版了《後歐洲》的翻譯:https://www.iwanami.co.jp/book/b10146259.html  日本語版へのまえがき まえがき 前 奏 故郷喪失的立場 第一節 

《後歐洲》西班牙文譯本出版

西班牙出版社 Mutatis Mutandis最近出版了《後歐洲》一書的西班牙文譯本。書本詳情見出版社網頁:https://mutatis-mutandis.es/libro/yuk-hui-post

《藝術論壇》對許煜的訪談

《藝術論壇》對許煜的訪談 Daniel Birnbaum 為《藝術論壇》(2025年9月,vol.64 no.1)訪問了許煜,訪問可按此閱讀: https://www.artforum.com/fea