Workshop: Cybernetic Hypothsis (31 May-1 June, 2016)

In or­der to re­think the con­tem­pora­ry in­tert­wi­ning of sci­en­ti­fic, tech­no­lo­gi­cal, eco­no­mic and po­li­ti­cal con­di­ti­ons, this work­shop fo­cu­ses on Ti­qqun’s “Cy­ber­ne­tic Hy­po­the­sis”. With the in­ten­ti­on of al­lo­wing dis­cus­sion to go bey­ond the his­to­ri­cal event of ‘cy­ber­ne­tics’ bet­ween ’45 and the seven­ties, “ge­ne­ral cy­ber­ne­ti­ciza­t­i­on” (Hörl 2013) will be the work­shop’s con­cep­tu­al star­ting point. This lo­gic is not only bound to a vo­ca­bu­la­ry con­sis­ting of ‘con­trol’, ‘re­gu­la­ti­on’, and ‘stee­ring’. Cy­ber­ne­tics, in fact, has be­co­me a con­tem­pora­ry mode of go­vern­men­ta­li­ty. Star­ting from this point, the work­shop’s main aim is to take a clo­ser look at the re­la­ti­ons­hip of cri­tique, po­li­tics, and tech­no­lo­gy wi­t­hin the lo­gics of cy­ber­ne­ti­ciza­t­i­on. In or­der to ac­cess this ma­ni­fold re­la­ti­ons­hip in par­ti­cu­lar, act and ac­tion are set as the key terms.

Ap­proa­ching cri­tique, the work­shop will not only pay at­ten­ti­on to the ur­gen­cy im­plied by the term cy­ber­ne­ti­ciza­t­i­on, act, and ac­tion ety­mo­lo­gi­cal­ly and se­man­ti­cal­ly. Car­ving out the im­pli­cit ter­mi­no­lo­gi­cal and epis­te­mo­lo­gi­cal pro­xi­mi­ty of cri­tique and cri­sis will also be one of the work­shop’s tasks. Un­der­stan­ding cri­sis in the ori­gi­nal sen­se as a crack, a cut, or a frac­tu­re, the fo­cus will be upon cri­sis’ con­tem­pora­ry mea­ning in terms of a sta­te of per­ma­nence, lin­ked to a go­vern­men­tal me­ans. Here, the sta­tus and the pos­si­bi­li­ty of in­ter­ve­ning with po­li­ti­cal ac­tion will be dis­cus­sed.

Thin­king bey­ond the as­sump­ti­on of a con­stant feed­back loop which ap­pro­pria­tes cri­ti­cal ac­tion, as well as a mere de­mand of an ‘outs­ide’ place of cy­ber­ne­ti­ciza­t­i­on, what nee­ds to be ad­dres­sed is both the pos­si­bi­li­ty of cri­ti­cal acts / ac­tion in ge­ne­ral and the spe­ci­fic stra­te­gies and tac­tics of ac­tion. So, this en­ga­ges the ques­ti­on of how to act and take ac­tion wi­t­hin trans­ver­sal mo­ve­ments of “de- and re­ter­ri­to­ria­liza­t­i­on” bet­ween ma­cro- and mi­cro-struc­tu­res (De­leu­ze/Guat­ta­ri 1993), as well as the ques­ti­on of the ‘po­li­ti­cal dif­fe­rence’ (e.g. Der­ri­da 1991; Mar­chart 2010)

In con­clu­si­on, the work­shop seeks to crys­tal­li­se the par­ti­cu­lar re­la­ti­ons­hip of act and ac­tion with cri­tique, po­li­tics, and tech­no­lo­gy. The in­vi­ted spea­kers are Alex­an­der Gal­lo­way, Orit Hal­pern, Erich Hörl, Bri­an Hol­mes, and Ja­son Moo­re. The two-day event is opened by an eve­ning con­ver­sa­ti­on “World-Eco­lo­gy, Ge­ne­ral Eco­lo­gy, and Cy­ber­ne­ti­ciza­t­i­on” by Erich Hörl and Ja­son Moo­re. Day two is di­vi­ded into three main pa­nels. Each 2-hour-pa­nel is sub­di­vi­ded into a 15 mi­nu­te pre­sen­ta­ti­on, fol­lo­wed by a 10 mi­nu­te re­s­pon­se, as even­tual­ly the dis­cus­sion.

The work­shop is or­ga­nis­ed by the DCRL, ICAM, MECS, and “Tech­no-Eco­lo­gies of Par­ti­ci­pa­ti­on” (part of the DFG-pro­ject Me­dia and Par­ti­ci­pa­ti­on)

Tuesday, 31st of May 2016
Eve­ning Con­ver­sa­ti­on, 6pm – 8pm, at Was­ser­turm

“World-Eco­lo­gy, Ge­ne­ral Eco­lo­gy, and Cy­ber­ne­ti­ciza­t­i­on”,
by Erich Hörl and Ja­son Moo­re

Wednesday, 1st of June 2016
Work­shop, 10pm – 6.30pm, 10am – 12am at Frei­raum

Opening – Erich Hörl
In­tro­duc­to­ry No­tes – Ri­cky Wichum

Pa­nel 1: Cri­tique and Cri­sis
Im­pul­se: Alex­an­der Gal­lo­way; Re­s­pon­se: Ma­thi­as Den­ecke
This pa­nel asks for the po­si­ti­ons and the epis­te­mo­lo­gies for a cri­tique of cy­ber­ne­tics. Here, dif­fe­rent un­der­stan­dings of cy­ber­ne­tics are dis­cus­sed, as well as the pro­xi­mi­ty of cri­tique and cri­sis.

1.30pm – 3.30pm

Pa­nel 2: Tech­no­lo­gy and Po­li­tics
Im­pul­se: Orit Hal­pern; Re­s­pon­se: Yuk Hui.
The se­cond pa­nel deals with the re­la­ti­ons­hip bet­ween tech­no­lo­gy and po­li­tics. The dis­cus­sion will be fo­cu­sed upon the turn from an al­most anti-tech­no­lo­gi­cal at­ti­tu­de towards the pos­si­bi­li­ty of cri­tique via the fi­gu­re of the ha­cker (In­vi­si­ble Com­mit­tee 2015).

4pm – 6pm

Pa­nel 3: Mo­des, Pos­si­bi­li­ties, and Con­di­ti­ons of Act & Ac­tion
Im­pul­se: Bri­an Hol­mes; Re­s­pon­se: Lau­ra Hil­le.
Pa­nel three ad­dres­ses the fi­gu­re of the en­e­my in re­la­ti­on to pos­si­ble mo­des, stra­te­gies, and tac­tics of ac­tion.

Clo­sing State­ments 7pm

Book launch:
“On the Exis­tence of Di­gi­tal Ob­jects” (Yuk Hui), at DCRL, Am San­de 5 Lüne­burg

Sin­ce the work­shop seeks to fa­ci­li­ta­te tho­rough dis­cus­sions, rea­ding Ti­qqun’s “Cy­ber­ne­tic Hy­po­the­sis” (2001) is re­qui­red.

Latest from Blog

“Technological Pluralism” in WIRED (vol. 50, Sep. 2023) (JP)

『WIRED』US版の創刊から30周年という節目のタイミングとなる今号では、「30年後の未来」の様相を空想する。ちなみに、30年後は2050年代──つまりはミッドセンチュリーとなる。“前回”のミッドセンチュリーはパックスアメリカーナ(米国の覇権による平和)を背景に欧米的な価値観や未来像が前景化した時代だったとすれば、“次”のミッドセンチュリーに人類は、多様な文化や社会や技術、さらにはロボットやAIエージェントを含むマルチスピーシーズが織りなす多元的な未来へとたどり着くことができるだろうか? 空想の泰斗・SF作家たちとともに「Next Mid-Century」を総力特集する。 テッド・チャン、劉 慈欣、池澤春菜、マリアーナ・エンリケス、倉田タカシ、N・K・ジェミシン、高山羽根子、ウォレ・タラビ、藤井太洋、ユク・ホイ、齋藤精一、ベッキー・チェンバーズ、長谷川 愛、三宅陽一郎、山田胡瓜、ププル・ビシュト、川崎和也、津久井五月、逢坂冬馬、安堂ホセ、池上英子、市川沙央、市川春子、伊藤亜和、稲見昌彦、円城 塔、岡 瑞起、川和田恵真、斉藤賢爾、齋藤帆奈、Jen.two、Jini、柴田勝家、アンソニー・ダン、陳 楸帆、エレナ・トゥタッチコワ、野﨑まど、伴名 練、比嘉夏子、Peterparker69、ジョアンナ・ファン、フラン・ラブシャーニュ、松田桂一、宮内悠介、村上由鶴、和田夏実、吉上 亮、水野祐、なみちえ、川田十夢など。 More info Full Text

『宇宙技芸の多様性』(by Daisuke Harashima) in The Adventurers of Media Theory (University of Tokyo Press, 2023)

著者 伊藤 守 編 発売日 2023/09/01 ISBN 978-4-13-050209-2 判型・ページ数: A5 ・ 400ページ はじめに(伊藤 守) Ⅰ メディア論の目覚め ガブリエル・タルド:モナド論からメディア論へ(伊藤 守) ヴァルター・ベンヤミン:媒質から複製技術メディアへ(竹峰義和) テオドール・W・アドルノ:同一化と抵抗の弁証法(竹峰義和)