Debate between Sloterdijk and Stiegler (27-28 June, 2016)

I am happy to be one of the organizers.


The Noötechnics collective is proud to be involved in the organization of this ground breaking event, featuring a debate between Bernard Stiegler and Peter Sloterdijk.
University in Nijmegen, The Netherlands, 27-28 June 2016

On the 27th and 28th of June 2016, the Radboud University of Nijmegen (the Netherlands) will organize, in cooperation with the Nootechnics Collective, an encounter between German philosopher Peter Sloterdijk and French philosopher Bernard Stiegler. This two-day encounter will consist of a public debate between these two thinkers, to be held in De Vereeniging in the city of Nijmegen during the evening of Monday the 27th of June, flanked by two expert seminars, one on Monday the 27th in the morning and the afternoon and one on Tuesday the 28th, also morning and afternoon, on the campus of the Radboud University (in these two seminars, some time will also be reserved for interventions from students of the Faculty of Philosophy, Theology and Religious Studies as well as master students who have followed an honours course on the work of both thinkers especially related to the theme of the encounter).

The title of the encounter is ‘Anthropos-Anthropotechnics-Anthropocene’ and this means that it will be thematically devoted to the relation between humanity, technology and ecology in the work of both Sloterdijk and Stiegler and more specifically to an exploration of the changing relations between the human and technology within the emerging context of the anthropocene – i.e., the new geological epoch proposed recently by geologists and earth systems scientists in which ‘the human’ has supposedly become the most important geological (f)actor.

The emergence of the anthropocene as an event of a truly anthropological magnitude, possibly representing the first genuine anthropological crisis and signaling the necessity of humanity to become fully mature and assume responsibility for its own fragile oikos, thereby establishing an ethical imperative with an absolute and universal appeal, as Sloterdijk claimed in You must change your life. As he wrote in a recent essay: ‘The coining of the term “Anthropocene” thus inevitably obeys an apocalyptic logic: it indicates the end of any peace of mind in the cosmos, on which historical forms of human being-in-the-world rested’. Stiegler also stresses the gravity of the ‘anthropocenic event’ (Bonneuil & Fressoz) and considers it to represent ‘a state of extreme urgency’. He points toward the duty of philosophy to live up to the urgency and gravity of this event by trying to think it and propose a strategy for exiting or overcoming the anthropocene and inaugurate what he calls the
‘neganthropocene’, which would consist in a global organological revolution. As he wrote in a recent lecture on the anthropocene given in 2014 in Canterbury: ‘The singularity of the Anthropocene as an organological epoch lies in the fact it has generated the organological question [
] bringing with it something new: its negative protention and the necessity of overcoming itself’.
Given the many remarkable parallels but also salient divergences in their respective, i.e., ‘sphero-immunological’ and ‘pharmaco-organological’ philosophical conceptualizations of the anthropos, its technogenic evolution and thoroughly technical condition as well as their estimations of our current global ecological predicament, we believe this encounter will most surely provoke many interesting and urgent philosophical questions and can provide crucial insights for the new self-understanding of the anthropos and its totally novel anthropotechnic situation emerging from the context of the anthropocene and thus for the question of how to deal, technologically but also culturally and politically, with our current situation and future destiny in view of the emerging anthropocenic condition.


Monday 27 June 2016, Morning-Afternoon
First Expert Workshop, 9:30h – 17:00h

Venue: Faculty Club Huize Heyendael,
Radboud University Campus

9:00h – 9:30h – Welcome with coffee and tea

9:30h – 10:00h

Opening and Introduction by Prof. Dr. Hans Thijsen, Dr. Pieter Lemmens and Dr. Yuk Hui

10:00h – 11:30h

Prof. Dr. Tom Cohen (State University of New York)

‘“Anthropocene Inc” and the politics of delayed extinction. Notes on the current acceleration’

Dr. Jason Moore (Binghamton University)

– ‘Against economism: The technics of cheap nature’

Prof. Dr. Howard Caygill (Kingston University)

– ‘Anthropocene or anthropite? The human extinction event’

11:30h – 12:00h – Coffee Break

12:00h – 13:30h

Prof. Dr. René ten Bos (Radboud University)

– ‘Anthropocene and cynicism’

Prof. Dr. Pieter Leroy (Radboud University)

– ‘The anthropocene: a critique from environmental history and environmental politics’

Prof. Dr. Peter Westbroek (Leiden University)

– Earth and civilization

13:30h – 15:00h Lunch Break

15:00h – 16:30h

General Discussion


Wrap up and closure

Monday 27 June 2016, Evening

Welcome to the Anthropocene

Public Debate Between Philosophers Peter Sloterdijk and Bernard Stiegler

19:30h – 21:00h

Venue: De Vereeniging, City Centre Nijmegen

Debate Between Peter Sloterdijk and Bernard Stiegler moderated by Lisa Doeland from Radboud Reflects and introduced by Dr. Pieter Lemmens from the Institute for Science Innovation and Society and Radboud University

Tuesday 28 June 2016, Morning-Afternoon

Second Expert Workshop, 9:30h – 17:00h

Venue: Soeterbeeck Conference Centre Ravenstein

9:30h – 10:00h – Welcome with coffee and tea


10:00h – 11:30h

Dr. Iwona Janicka (University of Warwick)

– ‘Politics and non-humans: Spherology and general organology as compasses for political practice?’

Dr. Sjoerd van Tuinen (Erasmus University)

– ‘Critique of negentropic reason’

Prof. Dr. Hub Zwart (Radboud University)

– ‘Anthropocene, noosphere and distributed reflection’

11:30h – 12:00h – Coffee Break

12:00h – 13:30h

Nootechnics Collective:

Dr. Sara Baranzoni (Universidad de Investigación de Tecnología Experimental Yachay)

Dr. Paolo Vignola (Universidad de Investigación de Tecnología Experimental Yachay)

– ‘The tragical end of the anthropocene between immunology and becoming sick. Symptoms and side effects’

Dr. Anais Nony (University of Minnesota)

– The Politics of care in the age of dispossession

Dr. Benoït Dillet (Loughborough University)

– ‘The anthropocene and geo-constructivism’

Dr. Paul Willemarck (Nootechnics Collective)

– ‘Sloterdijk: life and death of humankind’

Dr. Alexander Wilson (Aarhus University)

– ‘Biosphere, noosphere, infosphere: Epistemo-aethetics and the age of big data’

13:30h – 15:00h Lunch Break

15:00h – 15:30h

Questions for Prof. Sloterdijk and prof. Stiegler by Radboud philosophy students

15:30h – 16:15h

General Discussion


Dr. Yuk Hui (Leuphana University) and Dr. Pieter Lemmens (Radboud University)

Retrospective summary and conclusions


Wrap up and Closure

Latest from Blog

Review of The Question Concerning Technology in China (Genron, 2022) in Artscape (JP)

昨年、哲学者ユク・ホイの主著2冊が立て続けに日本語に翻訳された。その1冊が『再帰性と偶然性』(原島大輔訳、青土社)であり、もう1冊が本書『中国における技術への問い』(伊勢康平訳、ゲンロン)である。かれのおもな専門は技術哲学だが、過去には哲学者ジャン=フランソワ・リオタールが手がけた展覧会「非物質的なものたち」(1985)についての論文集の編者を務めるなど★1、現代美術にも造詣が深いことで知られる。 本書『中国における技術への問い』は、近年まれにみるスケールの哲学書である。著者ユク・ホイは香港でエンジニアリングを、イギリスで哲学を学び、ドイツで教授資格(ハビリタツィオン)を取得したという経歴の持ち主だが(現在は香港城市大学教授)、本書を一読してみればわかるように、そこでは英語、中国語はもちろん、ドイツ語やフランス語の文献までもが幅広く渉猟されている。そのうえで本書が投げかけるのは──まさしく表題にあるように──「中国」における「技術」とは何であるか、という問いである。 そもそもこの「技術への問い(The Question Concerning Technology)」という表現は、ハイデガーによる有名な1953年の講演(の英題)から取られている(『技術への問い』関口浩訳、平凡社ライブラリー、2013)。本書は、かつてハイデガーが西洋哲学全体を視野に収めつつ提起した「技術への問い」を、中国哲学に対して差しむけようとするものである。せっかちな読者のために要点だけをのべておくと、本書でホイがとりわけ重視するのは「道」と「器」という二つのカテゴリーである。大雑把に言えば、中国哲学においては前者の「道」が宇宙論を、後者の「器」が技術論を構成するものであり、ホイはこれら二つの概念を軸に、みずからが「宇宙技芸」と呼ぶものの内実を論じていくことになる。言うなればこれは、古代ギリシアにおける「テクネー」を端緒とする西洋的な「テクノロジー」とは異なる、中国的な「技術」の特異性を明らかにする試みである。 Read more

The Question Concerning Technology in China (Genron, 2022) is ranked no. 10 the Kinokuniya Humanities Award 2023 (「紀伊國屋じんぶん大賞2023」) (JP)

たくさんのご応募、誠にありがとうございました。 「紀伊國屋じんぶん大賞2023 読者と選ぶ人文書ベスト30」が決定いたしました! 「読者の皆さまと共に優れた人文書を紹介し、魅力ある『書店空間』を作っていきたい」――との思いから立ち上げた「紀伊國屋じんぶん大賞」は、今年で13回目を迎えました。 おかげさまで、本年もたくさんのご応募と推薦コメントをお寄せいただきました。一般読者の方々からいただいたアンケートを元に、出版社、紀伊國屋書店社員による推薦を加味して事務局にて集計し、ベスト30を選定いたしました。 ※2021年11月以降に刊行された人文書を対象とし、2022年11月1日~11月30日の期間に読者の皆さまからアンケートを募りました。※当企画における「人文書」とは、「哲学・思想、心理、宗教、歴史、社会、教育学、批評・評論」のジャンルに該当する書籍(文庫・新書も可)としております。 2023年2月1日(水)より全国の紀伊國屋書店で受賞作を集めたブックフェア・推薦コメントを掲載した小冊子の無料配布を予定しております。※フェアの展開規模は店舗によって異なります。詳細が決定しましたら随時このページや公式Twitterにてお知らせいたします。   出版社内容情報 諸子百家と人新世を結ぶ、まったく新たな技術哲学の誕生! なぜ「技術」は西洋の伝統のうえでのみ定義され、論じられてきたのか? ハイデガーの「技術への問い」を乗り越え、破局へと暴走するテクノロジーに対抗するために、香港の若き俊英は文化的多様性に開かれた「宇宙技芸」の再発明に挑む。京都学派から100年。「近代の超克」を反省し、東洋思想を再び世界へと開くために必要な、「道」と「器」の再縫合はどうなされるべきなのか。諸子百家と人新世を結ぶ、まったく新たな技術哲学の誕生! more info