Yuk Hui

  • YUK HUI
  • SYMPOSIUMS
    • Cybernetics for the 21st Century
    • Dialogues on Philosophy and Technology Research Seminars
    • Postmoderns and After? -40 Years after The Postmodern Condition
    • Towards a Techno-Ecology of Participation
    • 30 years after Les Immatériaux
    • Simondon and Digital Culture
  • TECH PROJECTS
  • ARTICLES
  • Books
    • Monographs
    • Anthologies
    • Edited Volumes
  • Media
    • Interviews
    • Press
  • EnglishEnglish
    • EnglishEnglish
    • 中文 (香港)中文 (香港)

Yuk Hui

On Digital Labour

June 18, 2009
Metadata/social network

The digital economy has been criticized as highly exploitable, especially following the web 2.0 tide, the Utopian thought of social participation becomes a double blade, on one hand we see the new possibility of participation, collaboration, resistance, etc, on the other hand, we also see that the generation of data/metadata from users actually becomes the most important asset of the tech companies. The most obvious, and important example is Google’s services ranging from search engine, to blog service, video sharing service, photo, maps, whatever you name it. Google is not only able to learn from the data inputed by the users, but also the user’s behavious itself, which immediately constitute the metadata of the users’ identity and behaviour for further marketing. While the users also participate to make the softwere better, not only by reflecting their opinions, but most importantly, developing tools around google’s service. The whole idea of Open API is a very clever way to open up the space for constant innovation outside the google office. Google’s support of open source movement is also a clever way, since economically there is no conflict with google’s own business, since it is free anyway. The faster the industry moves, the less competitors will be there, the more innovative the other players are, the better stimulation for further innovation. This opens up the question of “openness”, it is a very difficult term, and it almost covers most of the topics of media, political, social theories, and philosophy.

10 years ago, Terranova explored the idea of “free labour” meaning those who sought entertainment online are nevertheless labouring for free. This does look suitalbe for today’s situation as well, we, the members of social networking website, google users, are contributing for the capitalists for free. You couldn’t imagine that there is no way to escapet this totality of production, it is immanent, when you look for something online, sending an email, etc. But free labour is too easy. Months before, when Yan Butang, the chief editor of Multitude had a workshop on the Crisis of Capitalism in Goldsmiths with Bernard Stiegler and Scott Lash, he was saying how evil Google is, and the whole dirty scene of cognitive capitalsim. That sounds exciting actually. By the end, I wanted to ask him a question, “do you use Google?”, but my colleauge warmed me that it is really offensive, so I gave up, anyway he is a guest. I am sure that the answer will be positive. This is not to make fun of him, but rather it points out a more difficult and complicated question, if today the media theorists believe in exploitation of free labout, why are they still using Google to let themselves be exploited? This not only means, you don’t believe what you say, but also you don’t believe what you believe. This formmer is nevertheless conscious, since I know that this is an academtic language game; the latter means that you unconsciouslly discredit your believe, you don’t really know what you are saying. The recent post by Richard Rheingold on the iDc mailinglist honestly points out this contradiction:

“Maybe that at the same time we look closely at the way commercial interests have colonized public behavior, we ought to look at the way profit motives have made available useful public goods. May Yahoo and Google live long and prosper as long as I can view and publish via Flickr and YouTube. And if this means that I’ve blurred the line between my recreation and my labor, I have to testify that even after reflection I don’t mind it at all. It’s pleasurable, in fact. And I’m equally delighted that Google gives away search to attract attention, some of which Google sells to advertisers. I remember that when I first got online with a modem, the cost of accessing skimpy information online via Lexis/Nexis and other paid data services was way beyond my means. Now I get answers for any question in seconds. How many times a day were YOU exploited by searching for something without paying a charge for the service? Informed consent seems to me to be crucial — I choose to be exploited, if exploitation is how you want to see my uploading and tagging my photographs and videos. More people ought to reflect on who is profiting from their online activity, and it seems entirely reasonable to me that many would decide not to be exploited. I would never argue that people should refrain from witholding their labor, if that’s what they want to do”

“I choose to be exploited” is an interesting reply to Yan Butang’s critique of cognitive capitalism. This doesn’t suggest of being blind to the concept of labour, on the opposite, this is an invitation to look at the issue in a more critical way. It may also make sense to look at the digital labour in terms of Neoliberlaism, according to Foucault’s interpretation of American Neoliberalism in his course on biopolitics, the idea of labour as earning stream replaces Marx and Ricardo’s idea of Labour Time, the subject of work becomes an enterprise rather than a man whose use value can be quantitized in terms of working hours (as exchange value). The labours in this sense, are people who believe that they have the freedom to choose, and they know what they have to pay to exchange for something they need. The freedom of being an Homo Oeconomicus. This is probably the subject who can say “I choose to be exploited”. I choose, since I know what I have to pay back to Google, and I choose, also means I know what I can get from this, and it is clear that this is the fundation of this digital economy. It sounds fair enough, how can you expect to get something without exchange, even gift? The gift economy, is not only the rationality for the open source movement as some theorists believe it to be, but also the foundation of the whoe digital economy as well. And in order to maintain this mode of production, a specific aesthetics have to be established, it is the aesthetics of speed, geeky, convenience, the pleasure of enjoying the public time. It is not simply free labour anymore, even if you still insist it is, hardly can negate your being “free”, when I am writing this post, I used google search many times to check the spelling of the names. It is not transaction cost as well, since I am not paying commission, it is purely an exchange.

Share this
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • Whatsapp
  • Email

Recent Events

Lecture (2 June 2023, Tokyo College/Todai): For a Technodiversity in the Anthropocene

Lecture (23 May 2023, Kyoto University): On Co-Existence

Dialogue (25 April 2023, University of Tokyo/Tokyo): with Prof. Takahiro Nakajima (中島隆博) on Technology and the New Enlightenment 

Lecture (19 April 2023, University of Tokyo/Tokyo): Philosophy and Post-Europe

Dialogue( 23 March 2023,  E-flux/New York): Discussion with  with Barry Schwabsky on Art and Cosmotechnics

Lecture (22 Mar 2023, Princeton University/Princeton): War and Machine

Lecture (19 Dec 2022, Kunsthalle Praha/Prague): Launch of the anthology Technodiverzita

Lecture Series (5-7 Dec 2022, Taipei National University of the Arts/Taipei): Incompatible Thought: Legacy and its Recursivity

Symposium (16-18 Nov 2022, UNESCO/Paris): Journée mondiale de la philosophie 2022 : L’Humain qui vient

Symposium (22 Oct 2022, Fudan University/Shanghai): Art and Cosmotechnics – Symposium and Book Launch of the Chinese translation of Art and Cosmotechnics

Dialogue (17 Oct 2022, Encuentros de Pamplona) Debate with Hartmut Rosa on the question of technology 

Symposium (20-22 June 2022, Paris VIII University/Paris): Colloque d’hommage à la pensée de Bernard Stiegler

Keynote & Conversation (9 June 2022, Venice): Meetings on Art – Between the Enchantment of Technology and Technophobia in La Biennale di Venezia

Categories

Research Network for Philosophy and Technology

You might be interested in

Towards a Relational Materialism

Latest from Blog

“Technological Pluralism” in WIRED (vol. 50, Sep. 2023) (JP)

『WIRED』US版の創刊から30周年という節目のタイミングとなる今号では、「30年後の未来」の様相を空想する。ちなみに、30年後は2050年代──つまりはミッドセンチュリーとなる。“前回”のミッドセンチュリーはパックスアメリカーナ(米国の覇権による平和)を背景に欧米的な価値観や未来像が前景化した時代だったとすれば、“次”のミッドセンチュリーに人類は、多様な文化や社会や技術、さらにはロボットやAIエージェントを含むマルチスピーシーズが織りなす多元的な未来へとたどり着くことができるだろうか? 空想の泰斗・SF作家たちとともに「Next Mid-Century」を総力特集する。 テッド・チャン、劉 慈欣、池澤春菜、マリアーナ・エンリケス、倉田タカシ、N・K・ジェミシン、高山羽根子、ウォレ・タラビ、藤井太洋、ユク・ホイ、齋藤精一、ベッキー・チェンバーズ、長谷川 愛、三宅陽一郎、山田胡瓜、ププル・ビシュト、川崎和也、津久井五月、逢坂冬馬、安堂ホセ、池上英子、市川沙央、市川春子、伊藤亜和、稲見昌彦、円城 塔、岡 瑞起、川和田恵真、斉藤賢爾、齋藤帆奈、Jen.two、Jini、柴田勝家、アンソニー・ダン、陳 楸帆、エレナ・トゥタッチコワ、野﨑まど、伴名 練、比嘉夏子、Peterparker69、ジョアンナ・ファン、フラン・ラブシャーニュ、松田桂一、宮内悠介、村上由鶴、和田夏実、吉上 亮、水野祐、なみちえ、川田十夢など。 More info

Conference (14 Sep 2023, Athens): Philosophy of Technology – A Chinese-Continental Philosophy

Review of Art and Cosmotechnics (University of Minnesota Press: Minneapolis, 2021) in Leonardo (September 2023)

Reviewed by: Glenn Smith September 2023 [A note from the editors: this review is a condensation

『宇宙技芸の多様性』(by Daisuke Harashima) in The Adventurers of Media Theory (University of Tokyo Press, 2023)

著者 伊藤 守 編 発売日 2023/09/01 ISBN 978-4-13-050209-2 判型・ページ数: A5 ・ 400ページ はじめに(伊藤 守) Ⅰ メディア論の目覚め ガブリエル・タルド:モナド論からメディア論へ(伊藤 守) ヴァルター・ベンヤミン:媒質から複製技術メディアへ(竹峰義和) テオドール・W・アドルノ:同一化と抵抗の弁証法(竹峰義和)

Technological Accidents, Accidental Technologies (Joke Brouwer & Sjoerd van Tuinen ed., V2, 2023)

“Each period of technological development, with its instruments and machines, brings its share of specialized accidents”

© 2020 - Digital Milieu | Yuk Hui. All Right Reserved.
Site Design by ein doughnut studio

  • YUK HUI
  • SYMPOSIUMS
    • Cybernetics for the 21st Century
    • Dialogues on Philosophy and Technology Research Seminars
    • Postmoderns and After? -40 Years after The Postmodern Condition
    • Towards a Techno-Ecology of Participation
    • 30 years after Les Immatériaux
    • Simondon and Digital Culture
  • TECH PROJECTS
  • ARTICLES
  • Books
    • Monographs
    • Anthologies
    • Edited Volumes
  • Media
    • Interviews
    • Press
  • EnglishEnglish
    • EnglishEnglish
    • 中文 (香港)中文 (香港)

REVIEW / TRANSLATION / PUBLICATIONS / EVENTS