“On the Varieties of Experience of Art” in Theory, Culture & Society (vol. 40, no.4-5, 2023)

Few topics in social and cultural theory have been addressed so widely and thoroughly over the past decade as ontology’. This special issue is a sustained set of explorations and analyses mobilised effectively against ontology. The focus is Chinese thought and the work of French philosopher, classicist and sinologist, François Jullien. For Jullien, ontology is a question of the ‘qu-est-ce que c’est’, the ‘what is it that it is’: in effect interrogating the ‘is’ of the ‘it’. Instead of ontology’s mechanics of cause and effect there is an organicism of cognition of patterns. The authors in this issue with Jullien and through China find that in Chinese thought this question of being is very much displaced by a focus instead on life. Thus, the Dao De Jing, the Zhuangzi’s notion of the ten thousand things are rejections of ontology, as are Chinese gardens, geomancers, Yi Jing and other modes of divination. As are landscape, literati, the Book of Songs and the Book of Rites. The issue begins with Jullien and then Scott Lash who directly address this question of being on the one hand and life on the other. Ontology and the question of the ‘is’ are integrally intertwined with language: the question of the ‘is’, as Shiqiao Li demonstrates is one of predicational or propositional language, whose natural home are the highly inflected Indo-European languages from ancient Greek to modern European. Li juxtaposes this to the radically uninflected Chinese whose logographic nature is close to the similitudes of natural language and actually performative life itself.

The issue addresses art, in which Yuk Hui contrasts the West’s paradigmatic art form, tragedy, with China’s, which had neither epic not tragic poetry, but instead featured landscape, which Hui addresses through a Chinese inflected idea of Immanuel Kant’s intellectual intuition. Wang Min’an looks at Chinese art and poetry as a ‘view from above’ that has nothing to do with the stationary eye of Renaissance perspective nor the omnipresent vision of God but instead with the nonhuman visions in random motion, alongside the view, not of but by the mountains, clouds, rivers and trees. We segue to the ontology debate which have been perhaps most acute among anthropologists. Here William Matthews challenges Descola from the viewpoint of divination; Stephan Feuchtwang looks at geomancy and the patterning, as if written in nature of Chinese gardens. Wang Mingming shows that the anthropology debates were never about ontology as much as about animism and points to a very different idiom of neither ontology nor animism in the earth-centred cosmology of Fei Xiaotong. We look at the possibility of a critical theory in China. Julia Ng, Michele Ty and Peter Fenves explore Walter Benjamin’s anti-ontological critical theory in his encounter with Daoism. And Joyce Liu shows how Jullien’s anti-ontological ‘silent transformations’ can be countered by Zhang Taiyan’s transformed ontology as a critical practice overcoming the passivity of Confucianist naming.

The issue includes short essays on the initial reception of Jullien in France by Paul Ricœur, Jean-François Lyotard, and Alain Badiou.

more info

Latest from Blog

Chinese translation of ChatGPT, or the Eschatology of Machines (Voices of Photography, issue 35)

ChatGPT自2022年11月推出以來,便引發了狂熱與恐懼。它對不同語言的語義及語法的嫻熟掌握(但尚未精通內容),令只是期待普通聊天機器人的使用者感到驚訝。有些大學院校立即禁止學生使用ChatGPT來寫論文,因為它的表現優於多數人類學生。報紙上的專欄文章則宣布了教育的終結──不僅因為學生可以用它來做作業,還因為ChatGPT比很多老師能提供更多的資訊。人工智慧似乎已征服了另一個根據古典哲學來定義人性的領域:邏各斯(logos)。恐慌隨著存在領域(existential territory)1的進一步喪失而加劇。當氣候的崩壞和機器人的反叛召喚出了末世,人類歷史的世界末日想像變得更加強烈。 末日對於現代人來說從來都不陌生。事實上,哲學家卡爾.洛維特(Karl Löwith)在1949年出版的《歷史的意義》(Meaning in History)一書即指出,現代歷史哲學──從黑格爾(Hegel)到布克哈特(Burckhardt)──就是末世論的世俗化2。歷史的終極目標便是使超越的變成內在(makes the transcendent immanent),不論是耶穌基督的第二次降臨或只是成為神人(Homo deus)。更廣泛地說,這種對歷史時期的聖經式或亞伯拉罕式想像,為人類的存在提供了許多深刻反思,卻也阻礙了對於我們的未來之理解。 more