Crisis of Artistic System


“Reclaiming culture from industry and the British “Creative Economy”: An investigationof new configurations of the artistic system”

A paper given on the 11 November for the European Congress of Aesthetics in Madrid under the name of our collective Doxa. The paper is a bit rough, since I wrote it during the occupation of Deptford Town Hall. The core question of the artistic system for us today is the crisis of creativity. We propose to understand this crisis in three perspectives, namely: the limitation of the understanding of creativity, proletarization of artists under the speculative economy, and the organization of amateur production. If we refer to the myth of the UK culture industry, at the very beginning Chris Smith in his speech “No Wealth But Life: the Importance of Creativity” quoted John Ruskin’s Unto This Last, “There is no wealth but life. Life, including all its powers of love, of joy and of admiration. That country is the richest which nourishes the greatest number of noble and happy human beings…” well… then this creativity in the present has nothing to do with life, only profits and speculation (not to mention the cut on arts and humanities).

The particular thing interested me is the article “Marx After Duchamp, of The Artist’s Two Bodies” we quoted from Boris Groys. It states that since Marcel Duchamp, the ready-made or the industrial object replaces the intimacy between the artists and his works, which were based on bodily gestures. And as it was further supplemented from Marc Jimenez that Duchamp emphasized to him that he was making “object of art” but not “work of art”. The significance for me, is that the technical object is creating a short circuit, and from that moment on, the aesthetic experience, aesthetic judgment, and art production gain new relations with technology. A return to the good old days aesthetic judgement system is impossible (a necessary confusion: Marc Jimenez was defending Takashi Murakami on one hand and attacking Christian Boltanski on the other hand), and the future remains technologically dependent. The production of digital objects, for example amateur videos, photos, songs for Boris Groys are today repeating the post-Duchampian artistic practice, i.e. creating short circuits. This post-Duchampian artistic practice is now also subsumed to algorithms, creativity or even art is or at least becoming algorithm-driven.

Latest from Blog

“Technological Pluralism” in WIRED (vol. 50, Sep. 2023) (JP)

『WIRED』US版の創刊から30周年という節目のタイミングとなる今号では、「30年後の未来」の様相を空想する。ちなみに、30年後は2050年代──つまりはミッドセンチュリーとなる。“前回”のミッドセンチュリーはパックスアメリカーナ(米国の覇権による平和)を背景に欧米的な価値観や未来像が前景化した時代だったとすれば、“次”のミッドセンチュリーに人類は、多様な文化や社会や技術、さらにはロボットやAIエージェントを含むマルチスピーシーズが織りなす多元的な未来へとたどり着くことができるだろうか? 空想の泰斗・SF作家たちとともに「Next Mid-Century」を総力特集する。 テッド・チャン、劉 慈欣、池澤春菜、マリアーナ・エンリケス、倉田タカシ、N・K・ジェミシン、高山羽根子、ウォレ・タラビ、藤井太洋、ユク・ホイ、齋藤精一、ベッキー・チェンバーズ、長谷川 愛、三宅陽一郎、山田胡瓜、ププル・ビシュト、川崎和也、津久井五月、逢坂冬馬、安堂ホセ、池上英子、市川沙央、市川春子、伊藤亜和、稲見昌彦、円城 塔、岡 瑞起、川和田恵真、斉藤賢爾、齋藤帆奈、Jen.two、Jini、柴田勝家、アンソニー・ダン、陳 楸帆、エレナ・トゥタッチコワ、野﨑まど、伴名 練、比嘉夏子、Peterparker69、ジョアンナ・ファン、フラン・ラブシャーニュ、松田桂一、宮内悠介、村上由鶴、和田夏実、吉上 亮、水野祐、なみちえ、川田十夢など。 More info Full Text

『宇宙技芸の多様性』(by Daisuke Harashima) in The Adventurers of Media Theory (University of Tokyo Press, 2023)

著者 伊藤 守 編 発売日 2023/09/01 ISBN 978-4-13-050209-2 判型・ページ数: A5 ・ 400ページ はじめに(伊藤 守) Ⅰ メディア論の目覚め ガブリエル・タルド:モナド論からメディア論へ(伊藤 守) ヴァルター・ベンヤミン:媒質から複製技術メディアへ(竹峰義和) テオドール・W・アドルノ:同一化と抵抗の弁証法(竹峰義和)