Symposium: 30 Years after Les Immateriaux, Lüneburg, 21-22 May 2014

Anamnesis and Dis-Orientation – A Discourse on Matter and Time

Les Immatériaux demonstrated what Lyotard understands as the arrival of new material which can be understood in terms of a tele-communication model. This new configuration is the continuation of the modern project, while also became a counter force that subverts its vision, and brought forward a disorientation. The new materiality – in the name of the immaterial – as proposed by Lyotard during the preparation period of the exhibition demands a new metaphysics, not of creation but of interaction. This metaphysics, which is largely based on an interpretation of matter and time, was only more substantially expressed in his later works. A year after the exhibition, in a talk titled Logos et Tekhnè, ou la télégraphie (October 1986), Lyotard talked about the synthesis of time in terms of habitude, remembrance and anamnesis. Lyotard locates an anamnesis a possibility for a new philosophical discourse which goes beyond the technologos as well as writing, and he referred to Eihei Dōgen’s zen metaphor of the clear mirror to explain his notion of anamnesis. In fact, from the metaphor of Dōgen that Lyotard cited, one can retrieve a totally different relation between matter and time, which has been fundamental to East Asian thoughts and traditions. It was this different conception of matter and time that explains the absence of modernity in countries such as China, which experienced a dis-orient-ation after the confrontation with Western modernity. This difference also put Lyotard’s search of a new metaphysics into question: how shall one deal with the différend. This paper wants to start from matter and time, to re-consider the question of materiality from a global and historical perspective, especially addressing countries that never had a modernity (while accept a postmodernity) in its strict sense, and proposes to reconsider this différend.


Latest from Blog

Chinese translation of ChatGPT, or the Eschatology of Machines (Voices of Photography, issue 35)

ChatGPT自2022年11月推出以來,便引發了狂熱與恐懼。它對不同語言的語義及語法的嫻熟掌握(但尚未精通內容),令只是期待普通聊天機器人的使用者感到驚訝。有些大學院校立即禁止學生使用ChatGPT來寫論文,因為它的表現優於多數人類學生。報紙上的專欄文章則宣布了教育的終結──不僅因為學生可以用它來做作業,還因為ChatGPT比很多老師能提供更多的資訊。人工智慧似乎已征服了另一個根據古典哲學來定義人性的領域:邏各斯(logos)。恐慌隨著存在領域(existential territory)1的進一步喪失而加劇。當氣候的崩壞和機器人的反叛召喚出了末世,人類歷史的世界末日想像變得更加強烈。 末日對於現代人來說從來都不陌生。事實上,哲學家卡爾.洛維特(Karl Löwith)在1949年出版的《歷史的意義》(Meaning in History)一書即指出,現代歷史哲學──從黑格爾(Hegel)到布克哈特(Burckhardt)──就是末世論的世俗化2。歷史的終極目標便是使超越的變成內在(makes the transcendent immanent),不論是耶穌基督的第二次降臨或只是成為神人(Homo deus)。更廣泛地說,這種對歷史時期的聖經式或亞伯拉罕式想像,為人類的存在提供了許多深刻反思,卻也阻礙了對於我們的未來之理解。 more