Tristan Garcia: What is something? (6.10.14)

In the occasion of the Philosophy of the Web seminars in Lüneburg, we are happy to announce the intervention of Tristan Garcia, who will talk about something (lundi 6 octobreà 18:00 @ Cent­re for Di­gi­tal Cul­tu­res, Sülz­tor­str. 21–35, 21335 Lüne­burg, 2. Floor). Previous interveners: Alexandre Monnin (FR), Antoine Hennion(FR), Harry Halpin(US), Greg Elmer(CA), Scott Lash(UK), Antoinette Rouvroy(BE)

Abstract: As­su­ming that the con­cept of “so­me­thing” is the wea­k­est pos­si­ble de­ter­mi­na­ti­on of being, Tris­tan Gar­cia will ar­gue that “so­me­thing” is what is in­cep­ted by thin­king when it is ex­cep­ted by thin­king; it is so weak, that even its ne­ga­ti­on turns out to be its af­fir­ma­ti­on.Tris­tan Gar­cia will argue that the ono­lo­gi­cal mo­del he de­fends in his book “Form and Object -A treatise on Things” is a way to think about the wea­k­est pos­si­ble so­me­thing and he will dis­tin­gu­ish it from other con­tem­pora­ry spe­cu­la­ti­ve mo­dels and ob­ject-ori­en­ted on­to­lo­gies.

That on­to­lo­gy is turning up into so­me­thing ever­y­thing that was be­low “so­me­thing­ness” (an at­tri­bu­te, a non-exis­tent thing, a con­tra­dic­to­ry thing), and turning down into so­me­thing ever­y­thing that was bey­ond “so­me­thing­ness” (a sub­stan­ce, a per­son, the sa­cred).

Tris­tan Gar­cia will give a glim­pse in that ra­di­cal on­to­lo­gy, strip­ping all en­t­i­ties of their de­ter­mi­na­ti­ons, in­ten­si­ty or depth, not to pro­du­ce an ef­fect of uni­ver­sal equi­va­lence, but to find an end to the end­less li­be­ral on­to­lo­gy of mo­der­ni­ty, and he will sug­gest to con­sider the on­to­lo­gi­cal flatness as a gau­ge to re­co­ver the sen­se of dif­fe­ren­ces bet­ween ob­jects, ex­ten­si­ve re­la­ti­ons and va­ry­ing in­ten­si­ties.

Born in 1981 in Tou­lou­se, Tristan Garcia (Uni­ver­sité de Pi­car­die-Ju­les Ver­ne) en­t­e­red in 2000 the École Nor­ma­le Supéri­eu­re. Af­ter working with Alain Ba­diou, he was awar­ded his PhD for a the­sis on the sub­ject of “re­pre­sen­ta­ti­on” in hu­man arts, which he had writ­ten un­der the su­per­vi­si­on of San­dra Lau­gier. On the same year, he pu­blis­hed his first no­vel, awar­ded by the Flo­re Pri­ze and trans­la­ted in eng­lish un­der the tit­le: Hate: a romance (Fa­ber & Fa­ber, 2011). Working as a teacher on short-time contract in the Uni­ver­si­ty of Ami­ens, he con­ti­nued his ca­re­er as a no­ve­list (Memories from the Jungle, 2010; In the absence of final ranking, 2011; Browser’s chords, 2012; Faber. The destroyer, 2013) and he con­duc­ted fur­ther re­se­ar­ches in me­ta­phy­sics, lea­ding to the pu­blis­hing of Form and object. A treatise on things. He wro­te cri­ti­cal es­says about ani­mal suf­fe­ring (We, animals and humans, 2011) or TV se­ries (Six Feet Under. Our destinyless lives, 2012). This year, he took a year-long sab­ba­ti­cal, in or­der to work on a es­say about co­mic books and a new book of phi­lo­so­phy.

This event is part of the se­ries Phi­lo­so­phy of the Web, or­ga­ni­zed by Dr. Yuk Hui, CDC.

Latest from Blog

Chinese translation of ChatGPT, or the Eschatology of Machines (Voices of Photography, issue 35)

ChatGPT自2022年11月推出以來,便引發了狂熱與恐懼。它對不同語言的語義及語法的嫻熟掌握(但尚未精通內容),令只是期待普通聊天機器人的使用者感到驚訝。有些大學院校立即禁止學生使用ChatGPT來寫論文,因為它的表現優於多數人類學生。報紙上的專欄文章則宣布了教育的終結──不僅因為學生可以用它來做作業,還因為ChatGPT比很多老師能提供更多的資訊。人工智慧似乎已征服了另一個根據古典哲學來定義人性的領域:邏各斯(logos)。恐慌隨著存在領域(existential territory)1的進一步喪失而加劇。當氣候的崩壞和機器人的反叛召喚出了末世,人類歷史的世界末日想像變得更加強烈。 末日對於現代人來說從來都不陌生。事實上,哲學家卡爾.洛維特(Karl Löwith)在1949年出版的《歷史的意義》(Meaning in History)一書即指出,現代歷史哲學──從黑格爾(Hegel)到布克哈特(Burckhardt)──就是末世論的世俗化2。歷史的終極目標便是使超越的變成內在(makes the transcendent immanent),不論是耶穌基督的第二次降臨或只是成為神人(Homo deus)。更廣泛地說,這種對歷史時期的聖經式或亞伯拉罕式想像,為人類的存在提供了許多深刻反思,卻也阻礙了對於我們的未來之理解。 more